Adobe April 2013 Black Tuesday Overview
Adobe released their April 2013 Black Tueday bulletins:
# | Affected | CVE | Adobe rating |
---|---|---|---|
APSB13-10 | ColdFusion |
CVE-2013-1387 CVE-2013-1388 |
Important |
APSB13-11 | Flash Player and AIR |
CVE-2013-1378 CVE-2013-1379 CVE-2013-1380 CVE-2013-2555 |
Critical |
APSB13-12 | Shockwave Player |
CVE-2013-1383 CVE-2013-1384 CVE-2013-1385 CVE-2013-1386 |
Critical |
--
Swa Frantzen -- Section 66
Microsoft April 2013 Black Tuesday Overview
Overview of the April 2013 Microsoft patches and their status.
# | Affected | Contra Indications - KB | Known Exploits | Microsoft rating(**) | ISC rating(*) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
clients | servers | |||||
MS13-028 |
The usual monthly MSIE cumulative patch, adding fixes for two more vulnerabilities. Both are "use after free" memory management issues and they both allow random code execution. Replaces MS13-021. |
|||||
MSIE CVE-2013-1303 CVE-2013-1304 |
KB 2817183 | No publicly known exploits |
Severity:Critical Exploitability:2 |
Critical | Important | |
MS13-029 |
A memory management problem with the Remote Desktop Connection ActiveX control allows random code execution. Replaces MS09-044 and MS11-017. |
|||||
RDP CVE-2013-1296 |
KB 2828223 | No publicly known exploits |
Severity:Critical Exploitability:1 |
Critical | Important | |
MS13-030 | A vulnerability in the default access control lists (ACL) that sharepoint applies to lists allows unauthorized access to lists on a sharepoint server. | |||||
Sharepoint CVE-2013-1290 |
KB 2827663 | Microsoft claims the vulnerability CVE-2013-1290 was publicly disclosed. |
Severity:Important Exploitability:3 |
N/A | Important | |
MS13-031 |
Two kernel race conditions allow privilege escalation and read access to kernel memory. Replaces MS13-017. |
|||||
Kernel CVE-2013-1284 CVE-2013-1294 |
KB 2813170 | No publicly known exploits. |
Severity:Important Exploitability:2 |
Important | Important | |
MS13-032 | A denial of service vulnerability exists in the LDAP services provided by Active Directory. Also affects services such as ADAM and AD LDS. | |||||
Active Directory CVE-2013-1282 |
KB 2830914 | No publicly known exploits. |
Severity:Important Exploitability:3 |
N/A | Important | |
MS13-033 |
A memory corruption vulnerability in CSRSS (Client/Server Runtime SubSystem) allows for privilege escalation to the context of the local system and/or Denial of Service. Replaces MS12-003. |
|||||
CSRSS CVE-2013-1295 |
KB 2820917 | No publicly known exploits |
Severity:Important Exploitability:3 |
Important | Important | |
MS13-034 |
Improper path names used by the Microsoft Anti-malware Client (MSAC) allow privilege escalation to the LocalSystem account. Affects Windows Defender on Windows 8 and Windows RT. The update also contains functional updates. |
|||||
MSAC CVE-2013-1285 CVE-2013-1286 CVE-2013-1287 |
KB 2823482 | No publicly known exploits |
Severity:Important Exploitability:1 |
Important | Less Urgent | |
MS13-035 |
HTML validation is not done properly in Microsoft Office (InfoPath), Sharepoint Server, Groove Server, Sharepoint Foundation resulting in what looks like an XSS exploit resulting in privilege escalation. Replace MS12-066. |
|||||
HTML sanitization CVE-2013-0078 |
KB 2821818 | Microsoft claims "limited, targeted attacks" against the vulnerability. |
Severity:Important Exploitability:3 |
N/A | Important | |
MS13-036 |
Multiple vulnerabilities in the windows kernel mode drivers allow privilege escalation and read access to kernel memory as well as Denial of Service. Replaces MS13-016. |
|||||
Kernel Mode Drivers CVE-2013-1283 CVE-2013-1991 CVE-2013-1292 CVE-2013-1293 |
KB 2829996 | No publicly known exploits |
Severity:Important Exploitability:1 |
Important | Important |
We will update issues on this page for about a week or so as they evolve.
We appreciate updates
US based customers can call Microsoft for free patch related support on 1-866-PCSAFETY
We appreciate updates
US based customers can call Microsoft for free patch related support on 1-866-PCSAFETY
(*): ISC rating
-
We use 4 levels:
- PATCH NOW: Typically used where we see immediate danger of exploitation. Typical environments will want to deploy these patches ASAP. Workarounds are typically not accepted by users or are not possible. This rating is often used when typical deployments make it vulnerable and exploits are being used or easy to obtain or make.
- Critical: Anything that needs little to become "interesting" for the dark side. Best approach is to test and deploy ASAP. Workarounds can give more time to test.
- Important: Things where more testing and other measures can help.
- Less Urgent: Typically we expect the impact if left unpatched to be not that big a deal in the short term. Do not forget them however.
- The difference between the client and server rating is based on how you use the affected machine. We take into account the typical client and server deployment in the usage of the machine and the common measures people typically have in place already. Measures we presume are simple best practices for servers such as not using outlook, MSIE, word etc. to do traditional office or leisure work.
- The rating is not a risk analysis as such. It is a rating of importance of the vulnerability and the perceived or even predicted threat for affected systems. The rating does not account for the number of affected systems there are. It is for an affected system in a typical worst-case role.
- Only the organization itself is in a position to do a full risk analysis involving the presence (or lack of) affected systems, the actually implemented measures, the impact on their operation and the value of the assets involved.
- All patches released by a vendor are important enough to have a close look if you use the affected systems. There is little incentive for vendors to publicize patches that do not have some form of risk to them.
(**): The exploitability rating we show is the worst of them all due to the too large number of ratings Microsoft assigns to some of the patches.
--
Swa Frantzen -- Section 66
ISC StormCast for Tuesday, April 9th 2013 http://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail.html?id=3235
×
Diary Archives
Comments