Last Updated: 2014-04-18 17:08:52 UTC
by Manuel Humberto Santander Pelaez (Version: 1)
We have received reports by many readers about buggy tools to test for the heartbleed vulnerability. Today I want to show you how easy it is to check for this vulnerability using a reliable tool as nmap.
You just need to trigger a version scan (
-sV) along with the script (
ssl-heartbleed). The following example with show a command that will scan 192.168.0.107 for this bug:
nmap -sV 192.168.0.107 --script=ssl-heartbleed
This will be the output for a non-vulnerable website. As you can see, no warnings are shown:
If you are vulnerable, you will get the following:
For vulnerability testing, always use reliable tools which won't contain malicious code infecting your computer and won't give you false positive messages.
Last Updated: 2014-04-18 01:51:02 UTC
by Alex Stanford (Version: 1)
Update: CloudFlare posted in their blog twice today claiming responsibility for the majority of this spike. Quoting: "If you assume that the global average price for bandwidth is around $10/Mbps, just supporting the traffic to deliver the CRL would have added $400,000USD to Globalsign's monthly bandwidth bill."
It looks like, as I had suspected, the CRL activity numbers we have been seeing did not reflect the real volume caused by the OpenSSL Heartbleed bug.
This evening I noticed a massive spike in the amount of revocations being reported by this CRL: http://crl.globalsign.com/gs/gsorganizationvalg2.crl
The spike is so large that we initially thought it was a mistake, but we have since confirmed that it's real! We're talking about over 50,000 unique revocations from a single CRL:
This is by an order of magnitude the largest spike in revocation activity seen in years, according to our current data.
I have set up a new page for everyone to monitor the activity as well as see how we are obtaining this data. The page can be found at https://isc.sans.edu/crls.html.
How will you use this page in your projects or general analysis? We'd love to hear some ideas.
If you know of other CRLs that we can add, please let us know in the comments! Additionally, if you would like to see an API call added so that you can automatically query us for this information, please let us know so that we are aware of the demand.
On a side note, we can see a clear upward trend in revocations over the past 3 or 4 years:
What do you attribute this consistent growth in revocations to? What do you think caused the previous spikes?
If you have more information or corrections regarding our diary, please share.