Handler on Duty: Johannes Ullrich
Threat Level: green
Podcast Detail
SANS Stormcast Tuesday, August 18th, 2026: Apple Patches; Screen Sharing Security; Download More RAM
If you are not able to play the podcast using the player below: Use this direct link to the audio file: https://traffic.libsyn.com/securitypodcast/10056.mp3
My Next Class
Click HERE to learn more about classes Johannes is teaching for SANS
Apple Patches or iOS and macOS
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Apple%20Patches%20iOS%20and%20macOS/33254
Screen Sharing Security
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Apple%20Screen%20Sharing%20Security/33252
Download More RAM: Dismantling Windows Operating System Defenses with Mischievous Memory
https://www.usenix.org/system/files/usenixsecurity26-collins.pdf
My Upcoming Classes
https://www.sans.org/profiles/dr-johannes-ullrich
| Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices | Las Vegas | Sep 21st - Sep 25th 2026 |
| Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth | Amsterdam | Oct 12th - Oct 17th 2026 |
| Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices | Washington | Dec 14th - Dec 18th 2026 |
| Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices | Online | India Standard Time | Mar 15th - Mar 20th 2027 |
Podcast Transcript
Hello and welcome to the Tuesday, August 18th, 2026 edition of the SANS Internet Storm Center's Stormcast. My name is Johannes Ullrich, recording today from Jacksonville, Florida. And this episode is brought to you by the SANS.edu Graduate Certificate Program in Cybersecurity Leadership. Well, today we are a little bit heavy on Apple content here. First, we got Apple patches today for iOS and macOS. Now, I don't see a big surge here in a number of vulnerabilities like they've seen from Microsoft. So the AI search may not quite be happening for Apple as it does for Microsoft, but there's certainly some changes in how these patches are being released. First of all, we only got patches for iOS and macOS. We do have patches for the older version of iOS, that's iOS 18, in addition to the current version of iOS 26. Where it gets also interesting is that out of the 108 vulnerabilities being addressed in this particular update, 87, so the vast majority, is affecting only the old version of iOS 18. So this may be a little bit sort of a catch-up kind of release. There are only six vulnerabilities that affect all three operating systems. They're all WebKit vulnerabilities. So really no surprise here in this case. Remember a couple of weeks ago, we also had the screen sharing vulnerability being addressed for macOS. So that, of course, didn't affect iOS. So we don't really have a corresponding patch for iOS this time around. Overall, nothing that's already being exploited. Nothing sort of outrageous, dangerous that I sort of could spot by scrolling through these vulnerabilities. Definitely get these updates applied. We often do see some exploits coming out relatively soon after these Apple updates. There's also a Vision OS update, but Apple has not yet released any details regarding security content of that update, which is a little bit odd because often, if they pre -release a particular operating system, they may not give us the details because, well, the vulnerabilities affect other operating system too. But in this case, we'll see what comes out when the Vision OS vulnerabilities are made public. And then, well, I already mentioned the screen sharing vulnerability. I did publish a quick diary with some details how to make screen sharing more secure or how to disable it if you want to disable it because apparently, yes, it's being exploited. And it's almost a bit surprising that people have something like screen sharing exposed. But I think a part of what can happen here is that if you have it exposed or have it enabled on your internal, like home network, and then you're moving that system out into the world and you don't disable it, that's, I think, where it often happens. Also, there are some sort of interesting quirks here. If you remember, one of the vulnerabilities that was being exploited or was being published a couple of weeks ago relied on the fact that Apple screen sharing is really VNC. And VNC has sort of this system-wide password you can use to gain access to the screen. And Apple still supports that mode. First of all, I think that's sort of one reason why people may have a weak password. And then this particular exploit relied on the fact that once you connect to the system, you may see a password prompt, but you're connected, the process that you're connected to actually, you know, runs with a super user with root capabilities because, well, it has to then switch to whatever user you're logging in as. So I would definitely keep that disabled and restrict who can actually use VNC and or screen sharing. And Apple does provide these controls, but don't enable the VNC viewers may control screen with password option. And that's also a little bit, I think, oddly named because it sounds like, hey, if you disable it, then it can access without password. But also another little bit odd naming or odd feature here is the Apple Mac OS firewall. I see that often cause confusion because when you enable the firewall, well, there is sort of by default an exemption for all system processes like screen sharing. So in addition to enabling the firewall, you have to disable the open ports for the system processes and also for like downloaded digitally signed processes. So only then are you actually closed down. Even if you enable the stealth mode, if you don't disable the system binaries and the signed processes, well, you still have those ports open. And those are really the ports that matter because that's where stuff is listening at. So in some ways just enabling the firewall probably doesn't really make a real difference. And well, then we got yet another attack against access control of memory. This one affects Windows or at least the attack was specifically designed for Windows. They call it download more RAM and a paper published by University of Birmingham researchers as well as a researcher from Durham University. It was just presented at the USENIX conference. The problem here is that on any RAM stick you have a little EPROM and this EPROM or EPROM contains well basically the basic configuration of your memory. Now turns out on quite a few different vendors RAM sticks this EPROM is actually writable so it's not locked down. Now in the past there has been a vulnerability that basically abused this EPROM but this required someone to actually remove the RAM stick and then connect an EPROM burner to the particular chip on the stick and then basically change the settings and then reinstall the RAM stick. That's of course a fairly complex attack with physical access like that. What they now found is that because this EPROM is not actually right protected on a lot of systems well it can be overwritten with software running on the system. The second hurdle they had to overcome was that this requires access to the I2C bus which on Windows does require elevated privileges. Again if you already have elevated privileges this is not really a valid attack. Well they found that this can be implemented with just by exploiting a vulnerable driver but then you kind of already have to approach escalation that way. The other option they found is they found a particular overclocking tool for Windows that comes with all the drivers and such properly signed so you can run it as a normal user and it also does allow access to this EPROM and can then be used to basically make it claim that you have more memory. So they're basically doubling the size of memory that the particular RAM stick advertises. What happens now is if you're trying to access memory that doesn't exist it's actually just being rolled back to memory that does exist. So there's this rollover happening and with that the operating system the system does think you are accessing well unrestricted memory but you're actually accessing completely different memory that may have some restricted data in it. Interesting attack and kind of amazing that the system actually boots and doesn't just crash. Windows has now addressed this vulnerability in last month so actually this month's update so that's why they're publishing this paper now. So it shouldn't be a problem anymore as long as you are up to date. Well and this is it for today. So thanks for listening. Thanks for liking and thanks for subscribing and talk to you again tomorrow. Bye.





