This is a guest diary by Basil Alawi
One of the challenges that face security administrators is deploying IDS in modern network infrastructure. Unlike hubs, switches doesn't forward every packet to every port in the switch. SPAN port or network TAPS can be used as a workaround in the switched environment.
Fortunately with Vmware ESX/ESXi infrastructure we can configure a group of ports to see all network traffic traversing the virtual switch.
"Promiscuous mode is a security policy which can be defined at the virtual switch or portgroup level in vSphere ESX/ESXi. A virtual machine, Service Console or VMkernel network interface in a portgroup which allows use of promiscuous mode can see all network traffic traversing the virtual switch".
By default promiscuous mode policy is set to reject.
To enable promiscuous mode:
Using VMXNET 3 vNIC will provide better performance enhancement than other vNIC types.(Figure 1)
Figure 1(VMXNET 3)
Reserving memory and CPU resources is highly recommended to make sure that the resource will be available when it’s needed. (Figure 2)
Figure 2(Reserved Memory)
The test lab setup
The test lab consists of Vmware ESXi , Kali Linux, Security Onion and Metaspoitable. ESXi 5.1 will be the host system and Kali VM will be the attack server, while Metaspoitable will be the victim and Security Onion will run the snort instance.(See Figure 3)
Figure 3 (Test Lab)
Test Lab Network Diagram
The Network Configuration
For this experiment the vswicth has been configured with two ports groups. Virtual Machines port group which the default promiscuous mode is set to the default value "Reject" .The second port group is Promiscuous which the promiscuous mode is set to "Accept" ( See Figure 4)
Figure 4 (Vswitch Configuration)
The Security Onion has been configured with two network interfaces, eth0 for management with IP 192.168.207.12 and eth1 without IP address. eth0 is connect to the "VM Network" port group and eth1 is connected to the "Promiscuous" port group.
The first test is scanning the metaspoitable vm with NMAP by running and snort detected this attempted successfully. (Figure 5)
Figure 5 (Snort alerts for Nmap scans)
The second test is trying to brute forcing metaspoitable root password using hydra (Figure 6):
Figure 6 (Hydra brute force alerts)
The third attempt was using metasploit to exploit metaspoitable (See Figure 7).
Figure 7 (metasploit alerts)I will be teaching next: Defending Web Applications Security Essentials - SANS Cyber Security West: March 2021
May 29th 2013
|Thread locked Subscribe||
May 29th 2013
7 years ago
Promiscuous mode can be used to capture traffic like that, but this can be unreliable in larger environments:
running an extra VM on every host can be quite an administrative mess. An in-hypervisor solution is more
efficient. To get all the traffic in a distributed environment; this will probably require use of the
distributed virtual switch with port mirroring or SPAN capability of the Nexus 1000V or the likes of a
commercial solution such as Phantom Virtual Tap: in order to accomplish monitoring of multiple port
groups and ESXi hosts, without an extra snort vm for every host in the environment....
"Reserving memory and CPU resources is highly recommended to make sure that the resource will be available"
I strongly discourage setting any reservation values on any individual VM; this can be highly cumbersome to manage.
In case the VM gets vMotioned, these "reservation changes" can be lost.
Reservations are used to ensure that SLAs continue to be met during periods of resource contention, and therefore,
the implementation of large reservations has a potentially high cost for the business in case of contention,
especially 4 CPU Megacycles, that Snort probably does not require.
If there is memory contention, also, there is no reason Snort should be excluded from the ballooning or memory pressure:
that reservation could cause other workloads to be forced to Swap, even if Snort is not requiring that memory.
It is best practice that reservations should be set through the resource allocation tab of the cluster or parent resource pool;
after obtaining the requirements from the business,
and the reservations should be the minimum value required to meet the requirements.
These effect cluster failover capacity as well, and could mean that the Tier1 database VM or Exchange server isn't allowed to power on, due to clashing reservations.
I recommend to always be cautious with setting large reservations or setting limits, number of vCPUs, or shares on an individual VM.
May 30th 2013
7 years ago
Some things to bear in mind if you need to use VM's for traffic sniffing. First, the Snort VM must reside on the same host as the VM being monitored (either the source or destination), even with the Nexus 1000v, unless it is configured for ERSPAN operation. Second, this Snort VM must not be migrated with vMotion, the DRS or HA system while it is running for the reason mentioned first. Third, reservations aren't required since migration is detrimental to monitoring, and reservations are used for migration purposes.
Jun 3rd 2013
7 years ago
I have a packet monitoring solution running in this mode, but all traffic appears to either come from it or be destined to it. What's the problem?
May 21st 2018
2 years ago