June 2010 Microsoft Black Tuesday Summary
Published: 2010-06-08
Last Updated: 2010-08-12 18:46:38 UTC
by Manuel Humberto Santander Pelaez (Version: 2)
4 comment(s)
Last Updated: 2010-08-12 18:46:38 UTC
by Manuel Humberto Santander Pelaez (Version: 2)
Overview of the June 2010 Microsoft Patches and their status.
# | Affected | Contra Indications | Known Exploits | Microsoft rating | ISC rating(*) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
clients | servers | |||||
MS10-032 | Vulnerabilities in Windows Kernel-Mode Drivers Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (Replaces MS09-065 ) | |||||
Windows Kernel CVE-2010-0484 CVE-2010-0485 CVE-2010-1255 |
KB 979559 | no known exploits. | Severity:Important Exploitability: 1,1,1 |
Critical | Critical | |
MS10-033 | Vulnerabilities in Media Decompression Could Allow Remote Code Execution (Replaces MS09-028 MS09-047 MS08-033 ) | |||||
DirectShow, DirectX, Windows Media Format Runtime, COM CVE-2010-1879 CVE-2010-1880 |
KB 979902 | no known exploits. | Severity:Critical Exploitability: 1,1 |
Critical | Critical | |
MS10-034 | Cumulative Security Update of ActiveX Kill Bits (Replaces MS10-008 ) | |||||
ActiveX, Internet Explorer 8 CVE-2010-0252 CVE-2010-0811 |
KB 980195 | no known exploits. | Severity:Critical Exploitability: 1,1 |
Critical | Important | |
MS10-035 | Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer (Replaces MS10-018 ) | |||||
Internet Explorer CVE-2010-0255 CVE-2010-1257 CVE-2010-1259 CVE-2010-1260 CVE-2010-1261 CVE-2010-1262 |
KB 982381 | no known exploits. | Severity:Critical Exploitability: 2,3,1,?,?,1 |
Critical | Important | |
MS10-036 | Vulnerabilities in COM validation in Microsoft Office Could Allow Remote Code Execution (Replaces MS08-055 MS10-017 MS10-028 MS09-068 MS09-017 MS10-023 MS10-004 MS09-027 ) | |||||
Microsoft Office CVE-2010-1263 |
KB 983285 | no known exploits. | Severity:Important Exploitability: 1 |
Critical | Important | |
MS10-037 | Vulnerability in the OpenType Compact Font Format (CFF) Driver Could Allow Elevation of Privilege | |||||
Windows Kernel CVE-2010-0819 |
KB 980218 | no known exploits. | Severity:Important Exploitability: 2 |
Critical | Critical | |
MS10-038 | Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Office Excel Could Allow Remote Code Execution (Replaces MS10-017 ) | |||||
Excel CVE-2010-0821 CVE-2010-0822 CVE-2010-0823 CVE-2010-0824 CVE-2010-1245 CVE-2010-1246 CVE-2010-1247 CVE-2010-1248 CVE-2010-1249 CVE-2010-1250 CVE-2010-1251 CVE-2010-1252 CVE-2010-1253 CVE-2010-1254 |
KB 2027452 | no known exploits. | Severity:Important Exploitability: 2,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,1,1 |
Critical | Important | |
MS10-039 | Vulnerabilities in Microsoft SharePoint Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (Replaces MS08-077 ) | |||||
MS Infopath, Sharepoint Services CVE-2010-0817 CVE-2010-1257 CVE-2010-1264 |
KB 2028554 | exploits available | Severity:Important Exploitability: 1,3,3 |
Important | Critical | |
MS10-040 | Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in IIS | |||||
IIS CVE-2010-1256 |
KB 982666 | no known exploits. | Severity:Important Exploitability: 2 |
Important | Critical | |
MS10-041 | .Net Framework Data Tampering (Replaces MS09-061 ) | |||||
.Net CVE-2009-0217 |
KB 981343 | exploits available. | Severity:Important Exploitability: 3 |
Important | Important |
We will update issues on this page for about a week or so as they evolve.
We appreciate updates
US based customers can call Microsoft for free patch related support on 1-866-PCSAFETY
We appreciate updates
US based customers can call Microsoft for free patch related support on 1-866-PCSAFETY
(*): ISC rating
- We use 4 levels:
- PATCH NOW: Typically used where we see immediate danger of exploitation. Typical environments will want to deploy these patches ASAP. Workarounds are typically not accepted by users or are not possible. This rating is often used when typical deployments make it vulnerable and exploits are being used or easy to obtain or make.
- Critical: Anything that needs little to become "interesting" for the dark side. Best approach is to test and deploy ASAP. Workarounds can give more time to test.
- Important: Things where more testing and other measures can help.
- Less Urgent: Typically we expect the impact if left unpatched to be not that big a deal in the short term. Do not forget them however.
- The difference between the client and server rating is based on how you use the affected machine. We take into account the typical client and server deployment in the usage of the machine and the common measures people typically have in place already. Measures we presume are simple best practices for servers such as not using outlook, MSIE, word etc. to do traditional office or leisure work.
- The rating is not a risk analysis as such. It is a rating of importance of the vulnerability and the perceived or even predicted threat for affected systems. The rating does not account for the number of affected systems there are. It is for an affected system in a typical worst-case role.
- Only the organization itself is in a position to do a full risk analysis involving the presence (or lack of) affected systems, the actually implemented measures, the impact on their operation and the value of the assets involved.
- All patches released by a vendor are important enough to have a close look if you use the affected systems. There is little incentive for vendors to publicize patches that do not have some form of risk to them
Safari 5.0 is available for all platforms. Addresses some security issues, more here http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4196
×
Diary Archives
Comments
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 3rd 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> nearest public toilet to me</a>
<a hreaf="https://defineprogramming.com/the-public-bathroom-near-me-find-nearest-public-toilet/"> public bathroom near me</a>
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
Anonymous
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
distribute malware. Even if the URL listed on the ad shows a legitimate website, subsequent ad traffic can easily lead to a fake page. Different types of malware are distributed in this manner. I've seen IcedID (Bokbot), Gozi/ISFB, and various information stealers distributed through fake software websites that were provided through Google ad traffic. I submitted malicious files from this example to VirusTotal and found a low rate of detection, with some files not showing as malware at all. Additionally, domains associated with this infection frequently change. That might make it hard to detect.
https://clickercounter.org/
https://defineprogramming.com/
Dec 26th 2022
9 months ago
rthrth
Jan 2nd 2023
8 months ago