BIND OpenSSL follow-up
As a follow-up to the story from yesterday on the BIND DNS server updates (as a result of the OpenSSL signature validation bug)... It is difficult to tell whether the default BIND9 configuration turns on DNSSEC support by default. I reviewed the BIND documentation and the CHANGES file today. It certainly appears that the default settings for DNSSEC have been recently changed in the 9.6.0b1 and 9.5.0a1 releases. If you are running BIND DNS servers with DNSSEC, then you probably care that signatures check-out and you need to patch regardless of what the default settings are. Otherwise, this isn't an exploitation bug and you don't need to patch immediately.
×
Diary Archives
Comments
www
Nov 17th 2022
4 months ago
EEW
Nov 17th 2022
4 months ago
qwq
Nov 17th 2022
4 months ago
mashood
Nov 17th 2022
4 months ago
isc.sans.edu
Nov 23rd 2022
4 months ago
isc.sans.edu
Nov 23rd 2022
4 months ago
isc.sans.edu
Dec 3rd 2022
3 months ago
isc.sans.edu
Dec 3rd 2022
3 months ago
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is described as follows because they respect your privacy and keep your data secure. The social networks are not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go.
<a hreaf="https://technolytical.com/">the social network</a> is not interested in collecting data about you. They don't care about what you're doing, or what you like. They don't want to know who you talk to, or where you go. The social networks only collect the minimum amount of information required for the service that they provide. Your personal information is kept private, and is never shared with other companies without your permission
isc.sans.edu
Dec 26th 2022
3 months ago
isc.sans.edu
Dec 26th 2022
3 months ago