Handler on Duty: Guy Bruneau
Threat Level: green
Podcast Detail
SANS Stormcast Thursday, December 11th, 2025: Possible CVE-2024-9042 variant; react2shell exploits; notepad++ update hijacking; macOS priv escalation
If you are not able to play the podcast using the player below: Use this direct link to the audio file: https://traffic.libsyn.com/securitypodcast/9734.mp3
Possible CVE-2024-9042 variant; react2shell exploits; notepad++ update hijacking; macOS priv escalation
00:00
My Next Class
| Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth | Online | Central European Time | Dec 15th - Dec 20th 2025 |
| Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices | Orlando | Mar 29th - Apr 3rd 2026 |
Possible exploit variant for CVE-2024-9042 (Kubernetes OS Command Injection)
We observed HTTP requests with our honeypot that may be indicative of a new version of an exploit against an older vulnerability. Help us figure out what is going on.
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Possible%20exploit%20variant%20for%20CVE-2024-9042%20%28Kubernetes%20OS%20Command%20Injection%29/32554
React2Shell: Technical Deep-Dive & In-the-Wild Exploitation of CVE-2025-55182
Wiz has a writeup with more background on the React2Shell vulnerability and current attacks
https://www.wiz.io/blog/nextjs-cve-2025-55182-react2shell-deep-dive
Notepad++ Update Hijacking
Notepad++’s vulnerable update process was exploited
https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/v889-released/
New macOS PackageKit Privilege Escalation
A PoC was released for a new privilege escalation vulnerability in macOS. Currently, there is no patch.
https://khronokernel.com/macos/2024/06/03/CVE-2024-27822.html
Discussion
The Shibboleth vulnerability is quite interesting. In their example, the SAML signature covers the entire and they've made modifications to it (the changes to the uid) that should cause the signature to fail validation. This vulnerability speaks to larger architectural issues with Shibboleth. Obviously the signature validation is happening on a DIFFERENT document (the inline DTD defs are resolved and replaced) than the attribute extraction code works on (the inline DTD variables are not replaced). This is a HUGE no no and leads to the confused deputy issues that caused the vulnerability. I would bet other SP SAML parsing code is making similar mistakes.
Posted by Anonymous on Tue Jan 16 2018, 16:54
Login here to join the discussion.
| Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth | Online | Central European Time | Dec 15th - Dec 20th 2025 |
| Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices | Orlando | Mar 29th - Apr 3rd 2026 |
| Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth | Amsterdam | Apr 20th - Apr 25th 2026 |
| Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices | San Diego | May 11th - May 16th 2026 |
| Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth | Online | Arabian Standard Time | Jun 20th - Jun 25th 2026 |
| Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth | Riyadh | Jun 20th - Jun 25th 2026 |
| Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices | Washington | Jul 13th - Jul 18th 2026 |





