Podcast Detail

SANS Stormcast Friday, November 21st, 2025: Oracle Idendity Manager Scans; SonicWall DoS Vuln; Adam Wilson (@sans_edu) reducing prompt injection.

If you are not able to play the podcast using the player below: Use this direct link to the audio file: https://traffic.libsyn.com/securitypodcast/9710.mp3

Oracle Idendity Manager Scans; SonicWall DoS Vuln; Adam Wilson (@sans_edu) reducing prompt injection.

00:00

My Next Class

Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices	Dallas	Dec 1st - Dec 6th 2025
Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth	Online \| Central European Time	Dec 15th - Dec 20th 2025

… more classes

Oracle Identity Manager Exploit Observation from September (CVE-2025-61757)
We observed some exploit attempts in September against an Oracle Identity Manager vulnerability that was patched in October, indicating that exploitation may have occurred prior to the patch being released.
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Oracle%20Identity%20Manager%20Exploit%20Observation%20from%20September%20%28CVE-2025-61757%29/32506
https://slcyber.io/research-center/breaking-oracles-identity-manager-pre-auth-rce/

DigitStealer: a JXA-based infostealer that leaves little footprint
https://www.jamf.com/blog/jtl-digitstealer-macos-infostealer-analysis/

SonicWall DoS Vulnerability
Sonicwall patched a DoS vulnerability in SonicOS
https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2025-0016

Adam Wilson: Automating Generative AI Guidelines: Reducing Prompt Injection Risk with 'Shift-Left' MITRE ATLAS Mitigation Testing

iTunes

MP3 Download

RSS Feed

Google

Podbean

Amazon Echo

YouTube

Spreaker

Spotify

Discussion

The Shibboleth vulnerability is quite interesting. In their example, the SAML signature covers the entire and they've made modifications to it (the changes to the uid) that should cause the signature to fail validation. This vulnerability speaks to larger architectural issues with Shibboleth. Obviously the signature validation is happening on a DIFFERENT document (the inline DTD defs are resolved and replaced) than the attribute extraction code works on (the inline DTD variables are not replaced). This is a HUGE no no and leads to the confused deputy issues that caused the vulnerability. I would bet other SP SAML parsing code is making similar mistakes.

Posted by Anonymous on Tue Jan 16 2018, 16:54

Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices	Dallas	Dec 1st - Dec 6th 2025
Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth	Online \| Central European Time	Dec 15th - Dec 20th 2025
Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices	Orlando	Mar 29th - Apr 3rd 2026
Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth	Amsterdam	Apr 20th - Apr 25th 2026
Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices	San Diego	May 11th - May 16th 2026
Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth	Online \| Arabian Standard Time	Jun 20th - Jun 25th 2026
Network Monitoring and Threat Detection In-Depth	Riyadh	Jun 20th - Jun 25th 2026
Application Security: Securing Web Apps, APIs, and Microservices	Washington	Jul 13th - Jul 18th 2026

no transcript found