Threat Level: green Handler on Duty: Russ McRee

SANS ISC: InfoSec Handlers Diary Blog - New Microsoft Advisory: Vulnerability in Windows Kernel Privilege Escalation (CVE-2010-0232) InfoSec Handlers Diary Blog


Sign Up for Free!   Forgot Password?
Log In or Sign Up for Free!

New Microsoft Advisory: Vulnerability in Windows Kernel Privilege Escalation (CVE-2010-0232)

Published: 2010-01-21
Last Updated: 2010-01-21 01:03:17 UTC
by Johannes Ullrich (Version: 1)
4 comment(s)

Yesterday, we reported about a new Windows Kernel vulnerability [1] . The vulnerability affects all versions of Windows (NT 3.51 up to Windows 7) unless 16-bit application support is disabled. If exploited, the vulnerability will lead to privilege escalation.

Today, Microsoft released an official response in the form of a Security Advisory [2]. The advisory (KB Article 979682) states that Microsoft is investigating the report, and is not aware of any use of the vulnerability in current exploits.

According to Microsoft's list of vulnerable and non-vulnerable systems, 64 bit version of the Windows OS are not vulnerable, but 32 bit versions are. In part this is due to the fact that 64 bit versions of Windows do not include the vulnerable feature (16 bit compatibility).

The workaround outlined by Microsoft matches the workaround proposed in the advisory: Disable access to 16 bit applications. This should work well for the vast majority of systems. But be aware that there is a reason for this feature: Some old (very old) applications do require 16 bit support. This may in particular affect old custom software and support for odd hardware configurations. A standard office desktop should not require any 16 bit applications. As always: Test first.

The CVE number CVE-2010-0232 has been assigned to this issue [3].

[1] http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=8023
[2] http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/979682.mspx
[3] http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-0232 (not live yet as of this writing)

------
Johannes B. Ullrich, Ph.D.
SANS Technology Institute
Twitter

4 comment(s)
Diary Archives